Galactic Civilization

Downloads
Metaverse
NewsGroup
Community
Purchase
Galactic Forum
Strategies
Mods
Empires
Do you still think GalCiv 1 is fun even with GalCiv II out?
758 votes
1- Yes
2- No


Canadian Star Federation Empire Thread
  Search:   
Go to Bottom         Go to Bottom
#3400  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/18/2004 1:07:36 PM

What do they mean cheat


Frogboy said people are hacking a saved game to resubmit it as a different game. To me that is cheating. If that is the case I would not want these people in the metaverse.

                          
#3401  by Citizen Evil Druid - 6/18/2004 1:13:13 PM

Frogboy said people are hacking a saved game to resubmit it as a different game. To me that is cheating. If that is the case I would not want these people in the metaverse


We agree on that but he also used the word cheese. That's what scares me. I use the start game cheese so I don't waist a 1/2 hour to find no habital stars in my range. Unwinable. Is that cheese or cheating. I would throw the game away if I had to waist 5 starts to get a decent system to play.

                          
#3402  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/18/2004 1:20:33 PM

I did a comparison of the Altaverse listing with the current Metaverse rankings and the two that appear to be missing from the top, and there may be others below the top 50, are Lothmorg the Black and The Renegade. I hope this is all just a big mistake!

                            
#3403  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/18/2004 1:24:05 PM

The two people who are no longer in the metaverse are Lothmorg the Black and The Renegade.

Lothmorg was #1 and the Renegade was #7 two days ago.

I think that the next little while is going to be interesting.

                          
#3404  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/18/2004 1:26:28 PM

I tried to check below the Top 50 and as far as I can tell no one has gone missing.

                          
#3405  by Diplomat Technician - 6/18/2004 1:49:28 PM

I am shocked.

Lothmorg the Black did submit many games in day but many gamers claim they can play a game in 30 minutes.

Renegade played alot like me he has been around forever, got the games in because he was constantly at it.
[Message Edited]

                          
#3406  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/18/2004 1:52:18 PM

Hey Paguma, I just noticed that you submitted a v1.20 game instead of a v1.49 game. copy that ENDGAME to your v1.49 directory and resubmit and you will get your 60K score.



                          
#3407  by Citizen Evil Druid - 6/18/2004 2:35:43 PM

Hey Paguma, I just noticed that you submitted a v1.20 game instead of a v1.49 game. copy that ENDGAME to your v1.49 directory and resubmit and you will get your 60K score.


Really Newfy. That is interesting. I though the higher score came from the number AI you play against.

                          
#3408  by Citizen damoose - 6/19/2004 5:18:13 AM

Well... Frogboy has spoken. I'm unhappy. I just don't know who to be unhappy with... Frogboy or Loth/Mario. And there is no way for me to decide. I don't have the games in question to analyze and I've never watched Loth/Mario play a game. I am forced to choose between the integrity of Frogboy/SD and Loth/Mario. And I cannot.

What is truth? And who's truth?

A very sad unhappy Da Moose.

                      
#3409  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/19/2004 6:25:31 AM

A very sad unhappy Da Moose


I join you in your unhappiness

I cannot help fix what I don't know. But I can work to make what I know better. I do know that Stardock should be forthright in telling us how games are unique, what measures to they look at, how are they calculated, etc. If it is easy to tell they are unique, then the Meta ought to change its acceptance criteria for games that it accepts and reject those that it thinks are frauds. Perhaps this means keeping a separate file for each player to record an appropriate set of data to make that detemination, but is far better than to perform "witch hunts" every so often to root out "evil" from the Metavers.

                            
#3410  by Citizen Kazzryl - 6/19/2004 7:05:54 AM

A very sad unhappy Da Moose


And for me as well. Surprised, more than anything.

I just finished reading the thread over in the regular forum. It seems pretty clear what frogboy is suggesting happened, to me would constitute cheating. What makes me nervous is cheese, if they (SD) start discriminating that, quite a few of us would be gone ... control-n.

I do know that Stardock should be forthright in telling us how games are unique, what measures to they look at, how are they calculated, etc.


If they did that, wouldn't it make it easier for the cheaters to work around? I know it doesn't seem fair, but on the other hand spelling out exactly how to keep a game unique would just give enough info for a cheater to work around.

As far as Loth and Mario, I am still in disbelief. And I can't but help wonder if it just was some kind of flaw or fluke. Perhaps something to do with upgrading the game and then submitting an older version or something. But I have to just go with what Frogboy and co says. It is their Metaverse.


                        
#3411  by Citizen damoose - 6/19/2004 8:22:56 AM

But I have to just go with what Frogboy and co says. It is their Metaverse


Indeed.

                      
#3412  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/19/2004 10:20:12 AM

I feel that Frogboy and stardock were very convincing in their posts as to the cheating that was going on.

I am dissappointed that certain people felt the need to cheat.

This game is meant to be fun, the metaverse adds another realm to the game that is also fun individually and as a team. The forums arguably part of the metaverse just adds another element of enjoyment.

I think that Frogboy has strengthed the metaverse by the audit.

I for one feel it was a black day but I do not blame stardock I blame the people that were caught cheating.



                          
#3413  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/19/2004 11:10:32 AM

I am dissappointed that certain people felt the need to cheat.


Newfy,
I don't think that we have enough information from Stardock to reach this conclusion. I am not asking for trade secrets on how they determine what, just a better explanation that we have received so far, an explanation that asks more questions than it answers. Stardock seems to imply that they use a score to indicate sameness of a game. What make up this score, what are the elements, etc. Don't tell me what the vaules are, just so that we can understand that the score is in fact a valid proof that the game submiited was the same game as before and that they somehow (tell us how, not the details, but what was broken in the Meta- implication from Stardock is they don't know how it was done.

                            
#3414  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/20/2004 10:19:13 AM

Newfy,I don't think that we have enough information from Stardock to reach this conclusion


I disagree, Stardock has thoroughly satisfied me with their explainations.

From Frogboy
According to the Metaverse auditors, there were a number of top ranked players who had figured out a way to submit multiple entries for what was essentially the same game. We don't know precisely how they did this (hex editor, decompiler, etc.) but the only things that would appear different in the game were the gameID and sometimes the first researched tech. Otherwise, it was still the same map, the same enemies, the same everything.


Frogboy has stated through the 2 forum threads that it was the same game, same everything except the game ID.

I am more inclined to believe Frogboy for several reasons. Some of my reasons are,

Stardock has acted professionally in the past as well as this instance. Their past record has shown that they care about the gamers and their experiences with Stardock games.

There are several people that post several games per day including Greldon, Technician, Naqmir, exalted_druid among many others. Stardock obviously feels that these people are submitting genuine games.

No one likes to be accused of cheating if they aren't but I find that the actions of the accused are suspicious. Innocent people would try to prove their innocence. It has been my experience that people that are caught run and hide.

If you do not like my reasoning thats too bad. I personally think that you are wrong to persue their innocence but once again that is my opinion and I respect your right to try.






                          
#3415  by Citizen Paguma - 6/20/2004 10:44:16 AM

Hey Paguma, I just noticed that you submitted a v1.20 game instead of a v1.49 game. copy that ENDGAME to your v1.49 directory and resubmit and you will get your 60K score.


Really? Yeah, I did that because it was while on a work trip, and my laptop doesn't get along well with Stardock Central. The AP download kept failing.

                        
#3416  by Citizen Paguma - 6/20/2004 10:49:51 AM

This whole metaverse audit means that Technician is now the guy with apparently the most free time in the Metaverse!


                        
#3417  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/20/2004 11:07:30 AM

that Technician is now the guy with apparently the most free time in the Metaverse!


hehehe, that is good. Although to be fair Naqmir has posted about 68 games this month surpasing even I exTeam-mate.

                          
#3418  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/20/2004 11:07:33 AM

D&rn double post
[Message Edited]

                          
#3419  by Citizen Evil Druid - 6/20/2004 11:16:53 AM

There are several people that post several games per day including Greldon, Technician, Naqmir, exalted_druid among many others. Stardock obviously feels that these people are submitting genuine games.


No one could ever acuse me of hacking a game. Took me a month just to figure out how to move a saved game from 1 computer to another.

                          
#3420  by Citizen Paguma - 6/20/2004 12:09:05 PM

I know how Technician plays, and his style is very similar to mine. I "could" play 2-3 Huge-Masochistic games a day. I just don't want to.

It amazes me that those top players still find the game so fun that they play so much every day...






                         Posted via Stardock Central
#3421  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/20/2004 1:04:37 PM

There are several people that post several games per day including Greldon, Technician, Naqmir, exalted_druid among many others. Stardock obviously feels that these people are submitting genuine games.


Actually, Frogboy said they were all examined, implying that he did not believe that anyone could be submitting leagle multiple games per day. He went on to say that those people who do will continue to be watched. I interpret that to mean that Frogboy doesn't understand what is going on. Also, as stated by Frogboy, not all the games were the same. The first Tech was not always the same. There may in fact be other things that he did not mention that were not the same. We don't know everything that they have done or examined. We don't know what data is submitted with each game. We don't know a lot of things. Hence, I can only surmise that if they don't want us to know, there may be some things that would point the finger the other way, but since we don't know, we can correct it.

                            
#3422  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/20/2004 1:10:18 PM

If you do not like my reasoning thats too bad. I personally think that you are wrong to persue their innocence but once again that is my opinion and I respect your right to try.


Well,Newfy, I don't think I am pursueing their innocence as much as I would like to know what Stardock is baseing its reasoning on. They haven't told us much. Why would I trust them. I just finished a game that won't submit because it says that I was using an unauthorized custome map or scenario. I wasn't. I was just using the standard random huge map. Last time this happened, CariElf said that since I was using Mods, she could not load the game to see what was wrong. Now, if she could not load the game with mods. This time, no mods, and still same problem.

                            
#3423  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 6/20/2004 8:39:39 PM

Now, if she could not load the game with mods. This time, no mods, and still same problem.


It has been my experience that stardock and carielf do everthing that they can to debug a game problem. Sounds to me like you have a ligit problem. Are they working on it or have you yet to submit it?

                          
#3424  by Citizen Weyrleader - 6/21/2004 5:40:31 AM

Are they working on it or have you yet to submit it?


I submitted two games to CariElf this weekend that won't submit. One is with Mods and one without. After experimenting a bit, I think I have discovered the bug. If you use a custom map (whether you finish the game or not) and then switch back to a normal randomly generated map, you may or may not have a problem. If you use a custom map built by Stardock, no problem. If you use the custom map generated by someone else, for example, the one that was submitted to the Library, then something gets set in the game profile that tells the Meta that this is an unautorized map. That flag never gets reset until you load a Stardock generate custome map. Any games played after a non-stanedard custom map will not submit.

                            
<<   <-   130 131 132 133 134 135 136 (137) 138 139 140   ->   >> 
   Page 137 of 202   

Go to Top    Go Back to Message Board    Go to Top
To be able to post something you have to become a member
Click here!



Copyright 1995-2025 Stardock Corporation. All rights reservered.
Site created by Pixtudio and Stardock, designed by Pixtudio.