Galactic Civilization

Create account
Login
Downloads
NewsGroup
Community
Purchase
Galactic Forum
Strategies
Mods
Empires
Do you still think GalCiv 1 is fun even with GalCiv II out?
758 votes
1- Yes
2- No


The Prancing Pony (Fellowship of the Ring Empire Thread)
  Search:   
Go to Bottom         Go to Bottom
#1425  by Ambassador Ray the Wanderer - 5/22/2004 1:29:56 AM

The Metaverse has been wildly successful in getting people to play Galciv for a much longer time that they would normally would.

Yet, at this point in time, I would very much like to spend my gaming time playing games that challenge and interest me, and not play Galciv just to do well on the Metaverse, which I did for a good 8 months last year.

It is no longer the game that draws me back here but the people. So I'm just venturing to see if there is any opportunity to me to continue friendships built over these months elsewhere.

I'll definitely be keeping an eye out for strategy games that are conducive to community building.



                         Posted via Stardock Central
#1426  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/22/2004 3:07:23 PM

Thanks for the post Ray. Several of us were hoping AP would lure you back into game activity. Oh well, think about an AP game now and then plus please continue to stop by the thread.

                          
#1427  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/23/2004 6:06:46 PM

Happy Sunday. Saw a couple of good movies in the last two days. One was The Color of Money with Paul Newman and Tom Cruise. The other was Lone Star. Both were very entertaining.

I dropped in a 60k for the home team yesterday but haven't started up a game today. The NFL Europe football game is calling me to watch it. Later.

                          
#1428  by Citizen Lothmorg the Black - 5/24/2004 7:38:36 PM

Glad to see you back, if only for the people, Ray.
Actually, that is probably the most important feature of GalCiv.

          
#1429  by Veteran Captain Jack Sparrow - 5/25/2004 12:47:36 AM

Happy Sunday. Saw a couple of good movies in the last two days. One was The Color of Money with Paul Newman and Tom Cruise. The other was Lone Star. Both were very entertaining.


Get a copy of "The Hustler" with Paul Newman if you haven't seen it yet. It definitely fills you in on the character.

I thought TCOM was a prime example of the concept of an actor getting his well earned oscar a movie or two late.

                          
#1430  by Veteran Captain Jack Sparrow - 5/25/2004 1:04:31 AM

Not that TCOM wasn't entertaining. It was quite entertaining.

Oh and I saw some movies as well.

"Heat" with Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino and alot of other big hitters.

Too many cooks spoil the gruel. It was an excessively lengthy film that actually could have been done in two, rather than the 3 hours it took and lost nothing in the process. But It's still a good discount rental with coupon or something that they always put out.

Waterworld. Have you ever seen a movie that you absolutely know you should think stank but you like it anyway and darned if you know why?
This is one of those for me.

Terminator3, The Rise of the machines.
I finally saw this one for the first time. It is a good flick if you haven't hyped yourself up for it. But it's not going to dazzle you with much new compared to T2. The Bad Robot is a woman (and a wiley one at that) and she has internal weapons rather than having to steal one. Arnold is once again the good robot. Oh Cybernetic Organism. It fills in the story nicely though which is what I got it for.


I dropped in a 60k for the home team yesterday but haven't started up a game today. The NFL Europe football game is calling me to watch it. Later


Oh God if my wife caught me watching any football past the Superbowl and before college season starts she'd toss the tv through the window.

                          
#1431  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/25/2004 11:26:00 AM

Oh God if my wife caught me watching any football past the Superbowl and before college season starts she'd toss the tv through the window.


Jack, I am such a football junkie, I watched Arena football for a few weeks. Never understood it that well but the kickoffs were exciting. At least in NFL Europe they play outside on a big field.

                          
#1432  by Citizen Bakka - 5/26/2004 7:32:28 AM

RicBayer

ever watch Aussie rules footy?





                      
#1433  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/27/2004 6:51:10 PM

Bakka, I never have but if it is on TV after the NFL Superbowl but before NFL Europe, I may give it a try. Thanks for the tip.



                          
#1434  by Citizen Bakka - 5/28/2004 3:32:38 AM



                      
#1435  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 5/28/2004 3:59:33 PM

I've been away because of the game Runescape. Like most MOGs, very addictive (despite encouraging you to spend long periods of time standing still and mining coal). I've decided to try to resist the temptation to upgrade from the free version to the $5 a month version, if only because I might find it impossible to give up.

Played another game of GalCiv in an attempt to break me out of Runescape's spell. This time, I played in a Medium galaxy with all evil opponents for a conquest victory. On AP Beta, you can come close to 60K under those circumstances. Not quite as fast as an alliance victory, but more varied and unpredictable. There were two other races in my home sector. I researched 100% directly to Impulse drive, and then conquered one of them before he'd built any defensive ships.

A film I saw:
The Station Agent
This is an odd little film about a dwarf (not the bearded battleaxe-wielding variety) who is interested in trains, and... Well, that's a pretty comprehensive summary of the plot, come to think of it. Quite enjoyable, occasionally funny bits, but when it suddenly rolled the credits I was taken off guard - there had been no sense of climax.

                          
#1436  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/29/2004 3:15:19 PM

Put in another 60k for the home team. We are ahead of SF but now behind two groups of Guardians. .

I was wondering if Gal Civ AP non-beta was coming out this week but it doesn't look like it. Anyone know?

                          
#1437  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/30/2004 2:33:00 PM

I finally had to go to 1.49 and play something other than a gigantic (which I have played for months).

For starters, I tried a huge maso rare alliance victory strategy. Moving from 1.11, the majors seem harder to bribe and the darn Altarians who discovered the diplomatic translators were a challenge. After the Yor gave up leaving six majors, I was able to trade with all six. Also moving from 1.11, the Alexians were not a possible finacial crutch early in the game. Even getting those trade routes out early and having a PQ 20 Earth, I was strapped for cash. Finally I was able to bribe myself to an alliance victory. I ended with a 59k+ victory, which is close enough to 60k - and for a huge alliance win. Wow. This is a major score bump.

It is hard to ally when the morality is too far apart. How are others managing the morality and alliance? What are the default moralities of the majors you play?

                          
#1438  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 5/31/2004 3:57:12 PM

I'm playing with them mostly pure evil and myself as pure good. A couple of tricks I've learned (hope none of our rivals read this): (1) High initial diplomacy, obviously. (2) Ctrl-N until you're fairly central, so you get a better share of the galactic trade. This boosts relations and pays for future bribes. (3) You can't bribe someone twice in two turns, but you can bribe them twice in one turn. By the look of it, the best bribe is to keep giving someone small amounts (techs and cash over 99 turns) until they say, "You humans are always so generous..." If you can get everyone to friendly at the start of the turn, you can ally with them all at once.
Still can't get any minors to appear...
I frequently get beaten to Diplo Trans, but it doesn't matter that much. I just make it a priority to trade for it. When I'm playing for alliance, I'm not worrying about military, influence, etc, so I can focus on the things that count, like researching techs the AIs don't have.

                          
#1439  by Citizen musicfan55 - 5/31/2004 6:19:50 PM

Matthew thanks for the help. I will have to play some more alliance victory conditions soon. I had to check out the terror star strategy on large maso. Got a 60k for the military victory on large. This is score inflation even more than 1.11 did to 1.10 or those versions did to 1.05. No major is running away with the games with seven majors and 3 or 4 minors so that part is a little easier. 1.49 is a little different and still fun to play.

                          
#1440  by Citizen Moser_Alchemist - 5/31/2004 6:58:03 PM

Still can't get any minors to appear


This sounds like you have the minors switched off. Check the "minors" on/off button to see if minors are off.

                            
#1441  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 5/31/2004 7:07:25 PM

Check the "minors" on/off button to see if minors are off.

I'm 99.9% sure I did that.

Got a 60k for the military victory on large.

Check out my last game. 58.9K on medium.

                          
#1442  by Citizen Moser_Alchemist - 5/31/2004 7:25:32 PM

I'm 99.9% sure I did that


If the square next to words "Initial minors are off" is empty, it is off. It must have solid dot in square and the words "Initial minors are on" must appear. The first time I played I thought you had to put dot in square to turn them off when its actually the other way around.

editted for spelling
[Message Edited]

                            
#1443  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 6/1/2004 11:47:19 AM

editted for spelling

Good. Shows respect. Bad spelling irritates me.
Shame you got 'edited' wrong.

                          
#1444  by Citizen Magnumaniac - 6/1/2004 11:52:43 AM

Bad spelling irritates me.


It would probably be easier if you posted a list of what doesn't irritate you Matthew.

                          
#1445  by Citizen Moser_Alchemist - 6/1/2004 2:04:06 PM

Shame you got 'edited' wrong.


I saw that too, but decided that editing an edit would just be too anal.



                            
#1446  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 6/1/2004 5:00:39 PM

It would probably be easier if you posted a list of what doesn't irritate you Matthew.


Certainly:

Zeppelins
The word "Iconoclasm"
Créme Brûlè

Please confine all future remarks to these subjects.

                          
#1447  by Citizen littlewotts_ - 6/1/2004 5:09:31 PM

Zeppelins


Does this include Led Zeppelin?

                          
#1448  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 6/1/2004 5:14:25 PM

Led Zeppelin

The band was originally intended to be called "Lead Zeppelin", as in, "go down like a lead Zeppelin". But they thought the "lead" might be mispronounced to rhyme with "read", and so delibarately spelt it wrong. It is misspelt, and therefore irritating.

                          
#1449  by Citizen littlewotts_ - 6/1/2004 5:16:34 PM

It is misspelt, and therefore irritating.


Understood.

                          
<<   <-   50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 (58) 59 60   ->   >> 
   Page 58 of 68   

Go to Top    Go Back to Message Board    Go to Top
To be able to post something you have to become a member
Click here!



Copyright 1995-2024 Stardock Corporation. All rights reservered.
Site created by Pixtudio and Stardock, designed by Pixtudio.