Galactic Civilization

Create account
Login
Downloads
NewsGroup
Community
Purchase
Galactic Forum
Strategies
Mods
Empires
Do you still think GalCiv 1 is fun even with GalCiv II out?
758 votes
1- Yes
2- No


Empire Recruiting in the Galactic Forum
  Search:   
Go to Bottom         Go to Bottom
#150  by Citizen Smegged - 2/19/2004 12:36:35 AM

"We could ignore this community the way we ignore the CFC GOTM and still have fun..."


Realms Beyond was originally a diablo/diablo II community. Then when those games became old the community turned to other games. Particularly Civ III. On the big Civ III websites we found that tournaments were being run that didn't match our tastes. The tourneys encouraged milking the score and using exploits to win. So RB created their own tourney, shunning the Civ Fanatics Game Of The Month tourney. We started this tourney a full year after Civ 3 was released, and within the first few games, we had a workable list of "things to avoid". The things on that list were serious exploits of the game. Also, reloading from earlier saves was taken off the table so as to avoid the "perfect path to victory". RB players lived and died by their mistakes. And we had a bucketload of fun. Several of my most memorable games of Civ 3 were LOSSES in the early epics.

As time went on, the expansions were released, and that, combined with a fading interest in the game, I stopped playing the epics. However, the last time I checked, the tourney is still running strong, gaining new members fairly regularly.

I, and many other RB players were looking forward to a tourney run in a similar manner for Galciv, so hearing Sirian's loss of interest is a big blow.

-Smegged

                    
#151  by Citizen Bam_Bam - 2/19/2004 11:13:09 AM

Wombat,

Thanks for your thoughts. I agree that our very nature can alienate us from many in gaming communities, and our inclination to comment on "exploits", game balance, and the like may paint us as elitists. We do have to watch that our comments about our and others' gaming choices do not fall into the "looking down our noses" at others' efforts. It is a fine line, because we are so intense in our gaming. Not commenting on unbalancing play techniques is something few of us can abide.

We view constructive criticism on our gaming as inseperable from the experience--so many times we offer that criticism with the view that it will be as welcome elsewhere as it is at RB. That combined with our tone can get us into trouble. We will do our best to continue to offer advice on tactics/rulesets/etc. that we feel will enhance gameplay, provide balance and ultimately provide for longer game legs without being condescending or pejorative. There will be times where we fail, but we will respond and correct things if we have crossed the line. That has already happened here in discussions about the lightning alpha strike in a couple of threads.

Our succession games and tournament will be open to all, and I will continue to beat the bushes for participation from other empires--mainly because I have found that succession games and tournament games provides for a shared GAMING experience in a single-player game. The metaverse is a shared experience, but where it does not satisfy (for me) is the shared experience of the JOURNEY of the game. Succession games get that, and our tournament will focus on the journey (via game reporting).

Again--thanks for the thoughts and feedback.

                      
#152  by Citizen Sirian - 2/20/2004 12:33:37 AM

I hear that frustration and disappointment. You called me out in the RB thread on an incident that occurred a couple of months ago, where you and Ray had an exchange and he dismissed your attitude towards him. I added a wisecrack after that to the effect that you got what you deserved. My contribution was after the event, but I still reflect on that as poor, cheap behaviour on my part. I offer an unconditional apology for that and any other incidents that may have given offence. I have no problem owning up to things where I am in the wrong. - Wombat


Thank you.

I've written a lengthy reply, even by my standards, in another attempt to reach out, but I have thought better of posting it. I've hit the delete key instead.

I appreciate your remarks. I would like to pursue them, to further our understanding, but that would not be for the best. That urge has served me very poorly of late.

There's nothing more I should say on this topic. Sometimes things just don't work out as we hoped. You have my best wishes.


- Sirian

[Message Edited]

                        
#153  by Citizen Wild Wombat - 2/20/2004 3:26:22 AM

It's cool, and of course I respect that. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, and with that perhaps this dialogue would have happened earlier and in a different way, with a different outcome. You'll appreciate I'm only speaking for myself, not the community - but at the end of the day I just feel you're owed an honest opinion, at least by me. The "lengthy reply" has me intrigued, but I can understand your reluctance to enbark on that right now. I'm here mswales@hotmail.com Email but certainly don't feel that you have to persue it - sometimes the simple passage of time helps us all.

                          
#154  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 8:43:59 AM

bumped to preserve some of the original debate for forum guidelines


                          
#155  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 9/21/2004 9:26:47 AM

Yeah, but most of the people who participated in that debate are gone now. Their opinions don't count any more.

                          
#156  by Diplomat Peace Phoenix - 9/21/2004 9:33:17 AM

. Their opinions don't count any more.

Does this means that the US constitution should be completly changed since the writers are no longer alive?

                          
#157  by Veteran Terl - 9/21/2004 9:35:00 AM

Does this means that the US constitution should be completly changed since the writers are no longer alive?


I think John Ashcroft said yes...from way in the back....

                    
#158  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 9:58:30 AM

I personaly don't care either way... I'll go with the flow... but I'll be dammed if Starflett is going to sit here in the back forum out of peoples site while others now no longer adhere to the guidelines... there have been at least 3 empires in the last month who have disregarded the guidelines.. and i've come under fire for trying to get people to adhere to them... As usual every time I try to point something out the community I always end up being the bad guy... well so be it....If that is what its going to take to being people back to their sences....

i've done it before.. when massive empire swapping was beingf done simply because it could be done.. I swapped empires thus killing the Anzacs as I was empire of them back then.. and boy oh boy did i ever cop flack for that.. but it did bring people to their sences and the empire swwapping slowed down to a more realistic proportions...

I will do it again (well not leave Starfleet but) go along ands show the disasterous effects that will occure if and when people don't follow the guidelines... I'm used to be being frowned apon for my actions.. but I'm one player / emperor who stands by what I say...

So if you want to return to the old days with massive empire propagander in the main forum then go for it....
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED....

JTQ


                          
#159  by Diplomat Peace Phoenix - 9/21/2004 10:10:55 AM

there have been at least 3 empires in the last month who have disregarded the guidelines

Well let me see the threads that should have been started in empire forum:
- Diplomats, for finding lost members
- Guardian, for finding lost members
- Guardian, for explaining tha a new empire have appeared
- GROSS, for a call to all pirates
- Jedi for updating a story

I haven't any number about empire recruiting that have crossed the line.

Did I miss something?




                          
#160  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 9/21/2004 10:20:36 AM

Qwerk, I do not understand why you are being bothered by this.

One hand you say you don't care then on the other you are threating us to comply???




                          
#161  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 10:30:30 AM

Peace Pheonix if you are trying to get me mad you are succeeding

LOOK... I'm really getting pissed off with excuses that people are comming up with just so that their empire gets noticed by a wider audiance by posting EMPIRE RELATED messages in the main forum while others are sticking to the guidelines that were setup... its not just recruiting.. its any empire related topics that those NOT interested in EMPIRES were getting saick and tired of seeing... they calledx it EMPIRE SPAM...

I disagreed with these guidelines from the start.. because a smart person could and would find loopholes where they could ADVERTISE their EMPIRE



                          
#162  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 10:47:58 AM

I am worried ab out this because of US .. the empires who ARE sticking to the guidelines arn't getting to those non committed people and those who don't frequest the empires forum.. simply because we are obeying the guidelines... its placing them at a dis-advantage... there are either guidelines that are obeyed .. or there are no guidelines.. as people don't obey them... I did state when they came into being that I would obey them even though I didn't agree with them... and have done so since their inception..

What I don't appreciate is that when I point them out that I cop flack for doing so... and people making up excuses for why their Empire related messages in the general forum arn't breeaking the guidelines...

Do you guys really think that i'm that stupid.... that I don't know whats happening.. and that i'm that stupid that I won't voice my opinion.. or even worse that i'm that stupid that I like annoying the crap out of people and making myself even more dispised than I already am...

The last time i took a stand I almost left GalCiv because of the flasck that i copped.. but I was talked into staying... I know that there are quite a few out there who hate my guts.. because I speek my mind.. and do what I say i'm going to do..

Its ok if someone else dfoes it.. but not me.... well iu'm sick of it.. sick and tired of being at the wrong end of the stick... and to be honest .. now i don't give a dam what people think of me... I say what i say and do what i do... Isn't that what others do... it appears that way...

I don't threaten... its a promise... why should I be one of the few who comply...

(yes.. i'm one of the few people in real life who does obey the rules.. while others around fl;aunt them and get away with things and never get caught... when ever i've inadveretantly done something wrong eg speeding I'm ALWAYS the one who gets caught. and punnished to the full extent..)



                          
#163  by Citizen Matthew Downie - 9/21/2004 11:00:24 AM

there have been at least 3 empires in the last month who have disregarded the guidelines..


At least four if you include Starfleet:
If you people are really interested in overthrowing 1st place.. then consider joining starfleet.. as I'm not moving again.. and I'm a regular submitter to the metaverse... Why arn't I moving again.. its because this is the 3rd empire i've been involved in.. Starfleet can and will Outlast most if not all empires... even when people / members decide to move on.. as they will do.. however I will be here...

Why start a new empire when there is a stable hungry empire just waiting to be fed...


(Of course, that was on a thread that had already segued into empire-related discussions.)
The thing is, they're guidelines, not laws. Weyrleader said he left the Fellowship because he couldn't find the thread, and it's easy for new players to miss the existence of the non-main forums entirely. Is it any wonder that people send out calls to their comrades on the main forum? I'm pretty sure there was an informal agreement that it was OK to do that as long as the title explained that it wasn't for general consumption.

                          
#164  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 11:29:31 AM

Why shouldn't I reply in a post where others are blatently breaking the guidelines.. I'm not that stupid ... and thats what i'm saying.. that when the guidelines get broken its becomes uncontrolable... where do you draw the line.... I'm for abolishing them as there is no way to police them...

hows this for my excuse for doing it... its as good as anyone elses
"that reply was my way of trying to draw attention that the guidelines were being broken... "

Or arn't I allowed to break the guidelines either... even though i'm trying to inforce them...

(actually I got caught up with it all.. and forgot that we weren't in the empires forum..)

See how silly it is....
But once again.. I break the rules and I get caught..

If its good enough for one then its good enough for all..

I'm not saying that i'm perfect...and BTW how many other replys were in that thread where I placed that reply... talking of making a new empire and whast to call it etc...

I also noticed that you didn't quote another messagew where I stepped in an tried to drag the 2 empires back to where they should be talking about empire related stuff or the others going back since the guideliners inception where i've tryed to point out what they are...

If people are of the general concensous to get rid of the guidelines then fine.... but don't make me out to be the one who instigated the dropping of them just because I tried to inforce them and couldn't... and that I finally gave in too..

The more empire related messages that appear in the general forum the more others will say that I saw xxxx do it and get away with it...

IF the guidelines are going to work.... then they should be adheard to by ALL and every time that something is posted in the wrong area then it should be pointed out...

This isn't a BBS forum with moderators and such.. so there is no way to inforce them apart from critasizing those who break the guidelines.. and yes i've done it.. and yes i've been pulled up about it in the past...and no doubt will be in the future too...

If you break the rules/guidelines then you should be prepaired to to be pulled up about them.. just like in real life if you break the rules and you get caught...

Or are you one of those people who when pulled over for drink driving or speeding ... make excuses for doing it.. even though you know that you were doing the wrong thing...

The guide lines do exist (at this point in time) and should be inforced or its not fair to others who do stick to the guidelines....



                          
#165  by Citizen Weyrleader - 9/21/2004 1:22:04 PM

I had promised myself not to get invovled in this particular debate. It doesn't help any of us and new commers don't want to join a gripe session (usually, anyway). There are many threads in the main forum not related to the main issues of GalCiv. Future products, would you preorder..., windows blinds, etc. etc. Some more blatant than others. MOM is a thread totally currently unrelated to anything in GalCiv yet it is probably one of the most active threads.

I suggest we all take a three day holiday, get a life, and then start enjoying playing the game and the companionship of like minded people. Let's not worry about who posts what where. If you have concerns about it, just don't do it. If no one responds to an out of position post, it will die a natural death. If you want to pick up the thread, start on where it should be and people that want to discuss it with you will follow you there to discuss it. Posts bring more posts.

Weyr steps down from his soapbox and walks out of the park.

                            
#166  by Citizen Evil Druid - 9/21/2004 1:47:52 PM

J T Qwerk has a strong opinion on this matter and we respect and value his opinion. After he expressed his opinion yesterday we decided to let our thread fade away and die. He will have to forgive us if we do not understand his concern, as we were not around when whole recruitment debates happened. Nor do I care to read through the history. The thread proved humorous, but did not attract a single Guardian to visit us anyway.


                          
#167  by Citizen NewfyScotian - 9/21/2004 4:09:29 PM

I suggest we all take a three day holiday, get a life, and then start enjoying playing the game and the companionship of like minded people. Let's not worry about who posts what where. If you have concerns about it, just don't do it.


I agree! let it drop Qwerk.

                          
#168  by Diplomat Blue_Steel - 9/21/2004 8:29:18 PM

Of course the TOP rated empires would like to see this subject dropped....

But if thats the general concensus then I'll let it drop alright.. and i to shall post empire related messages in the general forum and forget about the guidelines...

                          
#169  by Veteran Grand_Admiral_Thrawn - 9/21/2004 8:53:00 PM

Qwerk, those messages are to kick people out. Not recruit people. Have you seen that nobody has joined the Diplomats recently? Much to my regret, we are dead. I haven't seen our current emperor in over a month, and our past emperor for days. I'm apparently running the place. And you accuse us of recruiting? I've got nobody to recruit! I wish I did! That is the best place to find them. There is nothing about it in the title about recruiting. I'm attempting to do the opposite.

But why are we having this conversation anyway? Why does this thread even exist? I don't remember anything good happening in this thread. I wish it had stayed dead.

                      
#170  by Diplomat Peace Phoenix - 9/22/2004 2:13:33 AM

Well, I know I should be let this thread die but:
Peace Pheonix if you are trying to get me mad you are succeeding

Nope, I just want to understand what I am missing. It looks like I haven't the same understanding of the rules than you. For me, the rules were set to:
- prevent empire threads for taking all space on the first page of the galactic forum
- avoid endless recruitements and endless empire banters in other threads, diverting them from their original subject.

BUT if I remember correctly a post from CariElf (too bad, I don't remember the thread in which it was), she doesn't want to have the empires leaving completly. She even suggest that from times to times, empires should make a small appearence in Galactic Forum (I don't remember exactly her wording).


                          
#171  by Diplomat Peace Phoenix - 9/22/2004 3:52:21 AM

I found the post I was refering to. It is the post 27 in this thread http://www.galciv.com/forum.asp?BID=GF&id=158569 Link
[Message Edited]

                          
<<   <-   1 2 3 4 5 6 (7)   >> 
   Page 7 of 7   

Go to Top    Go Back to Message Board    Go to Top
To be able to post something you have to become a member
Click here!



Copyright 1995-2024 Stardock Corporation. All rights reservered.
Site created by Pixtudio and Stardock, designed by Pixtudio.