Galactic Civilizations: Raven's Claw (The Galactic Guardians Empire Thread)

Create account

Downloads

NewsGroup

Community

Purchase

Galactic Forum

Strategies

Mods

Empires

Do you still think GalCiv 1 is fun even with GalCiv II out?

758 votes

1- Yes

2- No

Raven's Claw (The Galactic Guardians Empire Thread)

Search:

Sort by:

Go to Bottom

#6775 by Citizen Lothmorg the Black - 4/6/2004 3:43:30 PM

Can you do anything to get those TS's to move a little faster?

No.

#6776 by Citizen Greldon - 4/6/2004 3:49:41 PM

When building a TS next to an alien system, I use 10 constructors. Five for the base and TS, and five for defensive modules. (I rarely culture bomb) The AI won't question the defensive modules but will be unhappy if you add culture or offensive modules.

#6777 by Citizen damoose - 4/6/2004 3:49:43 PM

b) will Stellar Wake and Inverse Tractor Beam positively effect its speed (and similarly, Repair Bay for repairs, and so on

MD... Not for the TS itself, but for any other 'ship' in the sector. Another TS would be considered another ship. Same with plain old SBs in the same sector.

#6778 by Citizen damoose - 4/6/2004 3:53:58 PM

Can you do anything to get those TS's to move a little faster?

Not intentionally, but there is a bug, that allows you to fleet ships with the TS and the TS then moves at the speed of the ships. I believe it's still in existence. But it's so difficult to get to exploit I've only ever gotten it to happen once so I don't bother. The only time I worry about moving TSes is when they are on resources. Otherwise I 5 pack then disband.

#6779 by Citizen Major Dallas - 4/6/2004 3:54:42 PM

Is that Eastern, Central or Pacific time.

YAT. (Yorian Annihilation Time.)

#6780 by Citizen Greldon - 4/6/2004 4:03:42 PM

Not intentionally, but there is a bug,

Not any more, they fixed that bug. The way you did it was to fleet a ship with the terror star. Then with the TS in the group highlighted, save the game and reload. Then the TS would move the same as the ship. But like I said, they fixed it with 1.19.
[Message Edited]

#6781 by Citizen Arcilte - 4/6/2004 4:04:48 PM

YAT. (Yorian Annihilation Time.)

hehehe

#6782 by Citizen Major Dallas - 4/6/2004 4:04:52 PM

Otherwise I 5 pack then disband.

So, when you follow this strategy does each new SB cost incrementally more, or is the SB cost always factored on how many exist at the time you go to create the new one?

#6783 by Citizen damoose - 4/6/2004 4:06:46 PM

How many exist I belive.

#6784 by Citizen Greldon - 4/6/2004 4:06:47 PM

So, when you follow this strategy does each new SB cost incrementally more, or is the SB cost always factored on how many exist at the time you go to create the new one?

It's based on how many exist at the time.

#6785 by Citizen damoose - 4/6/2004 4:07:43 PM

they fixed it with 1.19

Good. Was cheese anyway.

And you know we never use cheese in the 'verse

#6786 by Veteran GASherbert - 4/6/2004 4:07:47 PM

So, when you follow this strategy does each new SB cost incrementally more, or is the SB cost always factored on how many exist at the time you go to create the new one?

I believe it is based how many exist.

#6787 by Veteran GASherbert - 4/6/2004 4:08:49 PM

This thread increases even as you read it...

#6788 by Citizen Greldon - 4/6/2004 4:16:05 PM

And you know we never use cheese in the 'verse

Absolutely not!!

#6789 by Citizen Evil Druid - 4/6/2004 4:16:50 PM

So, when you follow this strategy does each new SB cost incrementally more, or is the SB cost always factored on how many exist at the time you go to create the new one?
Factors on how many exist at the time. And don't forget the $5,000 fee to initiate. I have been ending my games with Alpha strikes. Build 5 constructers per remainig system. Then turn off all production for the required massive bank roll. Destroy all star bases no longer required to reduce costs. Move constructers off port of world. Then strike in one turn. It is such high to pull it off properly. Game over.

[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]

#6790 by Citizen Greldon - 4/6/2004 4:17:15 PM

This thread increases even as you read it...

Indeed....it has a life of its' own!

#6791 by Citizen Major Dallas - 4/6/2004 4:20:54 PM

Then turn off all production for the required massive bank roll.

ED, I've read that a balance above a certain amount (20K?) gets hit with a corruption penalty of some sort. Is that more or less accurate? At what level? And how detrimental is it to this strategy?

#6792 by Citizen Evil Druid - 4/6/2004 4:22:52 PM

I give up, screwed up those dam quote things in my last post and cannot edit back in. Sorry for the confusing post.

#6793 by Citizen Evil Druid - 4/6/2004 4:26:35 PM

ED, I've read that a balance above a certain amount (20K?) gets hit with a corruption penalty of some sort. Is that more or less accurate? At what level? And how detrimental is it to this strategy?

I read that at 25,000 some starts to get taken by crimnals but It is just a percentage, like everything else in the game. I read that it is a sign of bad goverment to have that much in reserve. Didn't notice the effect at all

#6794 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:45:25 PM

ED, just higlight the portion that you want to quote and then hit the "Q" thing at the bottom of the same post and it will quote.

I give up, screwed up those dam quote things in my last post and cannot edit back in. Sorry for the confusing post.

#6795 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:46:28 PM

Like I just did. But you must hit the "Q" in the same post you are highlighting and it will post in the empty white box where you post the messages.

#6796 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:46:40 PM

#6797 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:46:48 PM

#6798 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:46:56 PM

#6799 by Veteran Disciple777 - 4/6/2004 4:47:04 PM

<<	<- 270 271 (272) 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 ->	>>
Page 272 of 794

Go to Top

Go Back to Message Board

Go to Top

To be able to post something you have to become a member
Click here!